Spray-applied PUR is a polyurethane foam applied in liquid form using a spray machine. Upon contact with air, the two components react, causing the foam to expand within seconds before hardening into a rigid, continuous, and seamless insulating layer.
Its unique advantage lies entirely in this application method. Insulation boards must be cut, fitted, and installed. PUR, however, conforms exactly to the shape of the substrate: it flows around pipes, fills voids, and adapts to corners and irregularities without any manual adjustment.
A raw floor is rarely level and is almost always crossed by conduits and pipes. With boards, every obstacle requires cutting, every cut creates a joint, and every joint is a potential thermal bridge.
PUR eliminates the problem at the source: the insulating layer is monolithic. On renovation projects, where floor levels are uneven and networks are exposed, the actual performance gap compared to board-based solutions is greater than technical data sheets might suggest.
PUR is among the highest-performing insulators per centimeter of thickness, outperforming granule-based solutions EPS. For the same thermal performance, a layer of PUR is therefore thinner.
This difference becomes critical in renovations. When ceiling height is fixed, doors are already in place, and the threshold cannot be raised, every centimeter saved on insulation is a centimeter gained for the screed. This is often the deciding factor between insulating properly and giving up.
Exact conductivity values vary depending on the density and the system used: these can be found on the technical data sheet for the product being installed.
Spray application requires specialized equipment and a trained operator. It is not a DIY-friendly solution, and machine settings directly influence the resulting density.
The substrate must be dry and clean at the time of application. Depending on the uniformity of the expansion, leveling may be required before pouring the floating screed over it.
PUR wins on performance with reduced thickness and layer continuity. EPS remains a relevant choice for filling large gaps, correcting significant height differences, or sticking to a tight budget.
The question is not which one is better in absolute terms, but which one addresses the primary constraint of the project: height or the volume to be filled. A detailed comparison can be found in our article PUR vs EPS, and both solutions are presented on our thermal insulationpage.
Feel free to contact us directly: our team is always available to assist you and provide a 100% free quote.
Yes, that is the standard practice. The surface is leveled if necessary to ensure a flat plane, and then the screed is poured on top, almost always in a floating configuration.
For the same thickness, yes: its thermal conductivity is significantly lower. EPS retains the advantage for thick fill layers and cost.
It depends on the target performance, the project's regulatory requirements, and the available height. This is a calculation to be made on a case-by-case basis, not a standard value.
No. Once expanded and cured, the foam forms a rigid material that retains its properties. Protected by the screed, it lasts as long as the floor itself.